Washington gathered an army of 13,000 militia set out to wage war against the American people,

 Federalist v Ant-Federalist / Vaccinated v Anti-Vaccinated

Posted Nov 29, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

more

QUESTION: Hi Mr. Armstrong,

Thanks for all you do and all your hard work!

I have a question I was hoping you would comment on. I have been trying to wrap my head around the hows (not the whys) of the absurd consequences of this plandemic.  What it reminds me of is the fight between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists during the ratification process of the Constitution. I was taught the Bill of Rights bridged the gap between the issues back then and obviously satisfied their differences since the ratification went through.

Today, it seems as if there is no Bill of Rights and no possible bridge to balance political differences. There are tyrannical federal policies (under the guise of public health/national security) and the lawsuits from state AGs, governors and private organizations to prevent these policies.  This is the obvious recourse.  But it seems this is not enough and more importantly this recourse will not prevent the same thing from happening again in the future.

So my question is what recourse did the Anti-Federalists have (after the Bill of Rights were added to the Constitution) to address their worst fears? Elections? Overthrowing the government?

Are the Bill of Rights being violated just during this cycle of history?  Or is there really no other recourse besides arming ourselves if the police decide not to support the people?

JC

ANSWER: The recourse of the anti-Federalists was separation which led to the American Civil War. What you are saying is only partly true. They voted on the Constitution without the Bill of Rights. They got it through only on a majority vote of 39 out of 70 attendants. To the surprise of most, the United States was wrongfully created and the Federalists won at first, but it was the opposite party of Jefferson that eventually took down the Federalist Party.

It was Alexander Hamilton who led the charge to ratify the Constitution. He solicited John Jay and James Madison, and together they would create a series of 85 articles, published in the New York newspapers between October 27, 1787, and August 16, 1788, which became known as the Federalist Papers. It was Hamilton who chose the title of The Federalist, which was at that moment a controversial act of political aggression since it was the anti-Constitutionalists were actually for federalism insofar as it was a union. By entitling this article series The Federalist, Hamilton would take the high ground by asserting that the Constitution represented a better version of federalism than the Articles of Confederation.

Once federalism took hold, it quickly became self-evident that the people overthrew a king for ruthless bureaucrats. The Whiskey Rebellion was a tax protest in the United States beginning in 1791, during the presidency of George Washington. Farmers who used their leftover grain and corn in the form of whiskey as a medium of exchange were forced to pay a new tax. Yes – it was a 1791 version of Bitcoin. Many participants were Revolutionary War veterans, who argued that they were fighting for the very same principles of the American Revolution – no taxation without local representation. Of course, the new Federal government maintained the taxes were the legal authority of the taxing powers of Congress that they put in the Constitution – not the people.

It was in July 1794 this first confrontation between those who really had not consented to this federalism erupted into violence with more than 500 armed men attacking the fortified home of tax inspector General John Neville. President Washington responded personally with men he then called “rebels” to justify their massacre. Once the state attaches the label “criminal” it then justifies violence against them regardless of the issue in question.

Washington gathered an army of 13,000 militia provided by the governors of Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, and set out to wage war against the American people, most of whom had fought for American Independence. Washington rode at the head of an army personally. The rebels were way outnumbered and it became clear, pay your taxes or you will be dead. The rebels went home before the arrival of the army, and there was no confrontation. Nonetheless, it was at that moment that the evil of the federalist was exposed once and for all.

The union from that moment on was NEVER 100%. As I said, the ratification was 39 out of 70 votes and if human nature is what it is, there were probably votes that were bought with gold. It was this union by force that led to the American Revolution. The slavery issue was simply that it was the labor force in those days. Today they are outlawing fossil fuels which is already altering the course of the economy. Putting the human question of slavery aside and looking at this from an economic perspective, the North was telling the South they had to lockdown their economy and effectively terminate its existence. Naturally, with time, many stayed and were paid wages instead of just free room and board as was the case of serfdom. A serf could not be sold except with the farm whereas a slave could be sold individually.

In modern terms, if you are an outlaw the means to earn a living over whatever issue, they will rise up against the source of that decree. Hence, history will repeat because human nature remains the same. Consequently, the ONLY solution will be separation for the tyranny of the majority will also result in civil war.

California teachers are deliberately trying to indoctrinate 7th-grade children into being gay

 Biden Abusing the Law to Terminate Project Veritas

Posted Nov 20, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

more

The Biden Administration has shown its TRUE political colors. They have asked the judge in Project Veritas NOT to appoint a Special Master to oversee what the Justice Departed is really doing. They are not looking for a diary. They have seized everything and trying to destroy any such investigation into their own corruption using COVID. This is a complete violation of the First Amendment. Those in the Biden Administration keep showing that this is really an American coup to overthrow the Constitution at the instigation of questionable theories and origins.

Meanwhile, California teachers are deliberately trying to indoctrinate 7th-grade children into being gay. Reliable sources have been warning that this is part of the effort to reduce the population by encouraging LGBTQ relationships. I have hired gay people. They have the same rights as everyone else. But when teachers are trying to recruit 7th graders, this is something tax dollars should not be used in this covert movement.

Is there any wonder why 70% of Americans think the country is headed in the wrong direction”? I do not think the majority of people who voted for Biden had this in mind.

The Health Monopoly

 

Posted Nov 11, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Bill Gates will emerge as the richest man in human history, for he has succeeded in creating a health monopoly. The royalties from the never-ending vaccines will propel him to more wealth than Bezos, Musk, Buffett, and the top 10 COMBINED. He then puts his wealth in a foundation that will be exempt from the Billionaire Tax he has supported, which will undermine everyone else in the Billionaire Club.

It looks like the greatest plans of those who dream of controlling the world will not work out as they envision. Gates’ surrogates are putting out reports happily projecting their endless power over the world using this fake crisis. They will destroy the world economy indefinitely. Such medical promoters on the take from Gates’ Foundation may be putting their lives and those of their family at risk. They always project the future in a linear manner for they neither believe in God nor in the cyclical nature of the universe.

Richard E. Nesbett wrote an interesting book entitled “The Geography of Thought, How Asians and Westerners Think Differently … and why.” He attributed his work to a Chinese student who said, “You know, the difference between you and me is that I think the world is a circle, and you think it’s a line.” He goes on to quote him:

“The Chinese believe in constant change, but with things always moving back to some prior state. They pay attention to wide range of events; they search for relationships between things; and they think you can’t understand the part without understanding the whole. Westerners live in a simpler, more deterministic world; they focus on salient objects or people instead of the larger picture; and they think they can control events because they know the rules that govern the behavior of objects.”

This is why in Asia, I never had to explain that there were cycles. They looked at the West as primitive locked into this linear view of the world and we can see it in this global warming nonsense. They presume that because the planet warms in 20 years that the trend will last forever. Girls mature and eventually grow too old to produce children and then die for there is a cycle to everything. We all are born, we live, and we die. There is night and day and even the influenza virus mutates cyclically each year, so the vaccine changes. Nothing functions in a straight line yet in the West every form of analysis are linear. There are stock market crashes and they will launch an investigation to try to determine who caused it. Never do they ever consider themselves as any possible cause.

So those who think they are God and can manipulate society because the system is linear void of any nature cyclical nature will discover in 2022 that all things do not always just go up.

Gates is following the script left behind by Rockefeller. Their definition of being a philanthropist is akin to getting some girl pregnant to pay for the abortion, and that makes them a philanthropist. Gates’ monopoly over health is far more dangerous to society than Microsoft or Standard Oil in Rockefeller’s day. Perhaps the 2022 election will cause an upset, and an investigation into Gates and his surrogates will, at last, unfold — including Fauci, who is 80-years-old. Why is he still in government? It is not for a pension. He even had to start withdrawing from a 401K. He is clearly there only for power.

The Billionaire Tax will be for Everyone

 

Posted Nov 9, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Biden’s Wealth Tax is going to be very dangerous. For now, it is called the Billionaires’ Tax which means all assets are to be taxed worldwide. That will include the stock market, real estate, rare art, comic books, classic cars, jewelry, and collectibles. This new tax would apply solely, for now, to people with at least $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three straight years. These standards mean that just 700 taxpayers would face the additional tax on increases to their wealth.

Liquid assets, such as stocks, will be subject to the Billionaires’ Tax so they will pay this wealth tax on top of income taxes when they sell them. Bezos sold $2 billion worth of shares claiming g to link this to climate change but it certainly made sense to do this now. The way this tax will work is that they will be taxed only on any increases in value and take deductions on losses. Under current law, those assets get taxed only when they are sold. Therefore, this is like a property tax.

The problem will be that the Billionaires’ Tax would also face an additional tax on nontradeable/nonliquid assets such as real estate and business interests once those assets are sold. During the first year of the proposed tax, the billionaires would also owe taxes on any built-in gains that predate the tax.

 

The Billionaire Tax will be for Everyone

They passed the Income Tax in 1913 swearing it would only apply to the rich. Once any tax is created, it will NEVER be rescinded and as such it will always be expanded the same way they keep redefining who is actually the hated rich. Nancy Pelosi said on CNN said that the tax would raise $200 billion to $250 billion. This is nonsense and it presumes a constant bull market. This will never pay for the spending of Biden claiming it will not raise the deficit. This simply means that additional taxes, such as the global minimum tax and increased enforcement of the IRS, will be needed but it would still not close the gap. The easy way is to just redefine the rich. The Billionaire Tax becomes the Millionaire Tax.

Clinton’s tax hike redefined the rich by changing the brackets. They could even impose a tax based upon vaccination or not. The Supreme Court will no longer defend the people for fear that Biden will try to stack the court when his report on that is delivered December 15th. Biden is just the placeholder and he will sign whatever is put in front of him.

There is absolutely no need for this infrastructure bill whatsoever. Help Wanted signs are everywhere. Just end the COVID exaggerated restrictions and the economy would bounce back,

Musk Offers to End World Hunger Under One Stipulation

 

Posted Nov 3, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

If billionaires paid their fair share, we could allegedly solve world hunger. How?

David Beasley, director of the UN’s World Food Programme (WFP), called out billionaires such as Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos for not donating funds to solve world hunger. “Just $6 billion could keep 42 million people from dying,” Beasley claimed. Musk took to Twitter with a bold offer — he would personally donate $6 billion if the WFP could explain precisely how they would spend the funds. Furthermore, the richest man in the world is asking the WFP to provide a public record of exactly how the money will be spent.

David Beasley replied to Musk, “Headline not accurate. $6B will not solve world hunger, but it WILL prevent geopolitical instability, mass migration and save 42 million people on the brink of starvation. An unprecedented crisis and a perfect storm due to Covid/conflict/climate crises.” In other words, $6 billion will not solve world hunger as the people managing that sum of money could never keep it out of their pockets. Musk replied to Beasley with a link to an ongoing, unpunished, child sex abuse scandal where UN “peacekeepers” abused hungry children. The details are too grotesque to publish here, but make no mistake about it — the UN is not an entity intent on saving the world. They had to turn down a generous donation of $6 billion because they knew that they could never report the paper trail, and the results would likely be a request for more money.