Revolution v Civil War - tripartite break up

Posted Dec 26, 2023 By Martin Armstrong |  

A revolution cannot be used interchangeably with “civil war.” For you see, a civil war occurs when the people are divided and fight one another; a revolution occurs when the people join forces and overthrow the government. As indicated in the Oxford dictionary:

Revolution – a forcible overthrow of a government or social order, in favor of a new system

Civil War – a war between citizens of the same country

Politics has successfully divided the nation, and the pandemic exacerbated the differences between the left and right. They have attempted to divide us by class – the haves and have-nots. We have the welfare state on one side and a select few amassing the majority of the world’s wealth on the other. The 99% in the middle are now fighting against one another, with some pushing for socialism to ensure we are all financially equally. As the saying goes, “You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”

 

 

They have attempted to divide us through religion, as we even saw Soros-backed protestors entering churches during services. Traditional values have been demonized by the left, who believes those wishing to preserve their way of life are outdated. The nuclear family, pillar to any religion and society as a whole, has been destroyed. Monogamy has fallen out of popularity and birth rates continually decline. People on the far-right do not want abortion under any circumstance or same-sex marriage. The people on the far-left believe children should have the authority to change their gender, and there are hundreds of genders to choose from.

They have attempted to divide us through race. They implemented Critical Race Theory curriculum in the schools intended to create white guilt and anger among minorities. Kids don’t see race, but the schools ensure they do at a young age. Politicians on the left continually promise reparations, believing that people should pay for the misdoings of their ancestors even though only a tiny fraction of Americans had ancestors who owned slaves. The public school curriculum supports far-left ideologies and indoctrinates young minds to believe in a false reality.

We saw the rise of movements like Black Lives Matter, where it was permissible to burn down cities with no legal repercussions in the name of civil rights. Then we have a disproportionate of number of Blacks in our prisons due to laws that were intended to target them. We saw a rising wave of hate against Asians after China was blamed for spreading COVID to the world.

Speaking of COVID, the pandemic did more damage to divide our nation than anything in recent history. People were forcibly separated and forbid to socialize with their own families. Religion was not enough of an excuse to avoid the vaccine or attend religious services. Countless small businesses failed and people lost their jobs, contributing to the class warfare crisis. The unvaccinated were demonized as the biggest threat to the nation and there were calls for their extermination. Everyone was forced to choose a side amid the pandemic.

Video Player

00:00

00:44

If the people were not divided, they would realize that government is pinning us against one another. The current administration took the Constitution and set it on fire. We are rapidly losing every single freedom from free speech, the right to bear arms, and even the most basic right to elect the people in positions of power who make decisions on our behalf. The government is the enemy – there will be a revolution once people realize their fellow neighbor is not the problem.

By the time we get to 2032, that will be the light at the end of the tunnel. Neither side will accept the results of the election if they bother to hold one at all. The USA will eventually break into three primary regions: 2) the South & Midwest Bible Belt will join together against, 2) the Northeast, and 3) the Pacific States will be their own la-la-land. The volatility will begin in 2024, but by 2032, the United States of America will be far from united.

The Hoax of Biden’s Democracy Summit

 

Posted Dec 10, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

more

The #1 Fake News Network in the world, CNN, has gone after China and Russia for calling Biden’s Summit of Democracy a joke. Of course, CNN apparently does not know how to pick up a dictionary. Here in the United States, we have a republic – not a democracy. And in Europe, the whole political structure is a fraud for the people neither vote for anyone on the European Commission nor they do not vote for the head of state.

I suppose they never actually listened to the words of the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag:

“I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands,

one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all,”

It explicitly states that the US is NOT a Democracy but a Republic. It is a joke that politicians pretend that we live in a democracy when we do not and Klaus Schwab’s 2030 agenda included the end of the right to even vote. Moreover, the press is no longer free and it is pushing its own agenda.

They refuse to investigate anything to do with COVID or the conflicts of interest elevating Gates to a world health czar who is not even a doctor any more than Schwab or the head of the WHO. The press has fully embraced the canceled culture and thinks “freedom of the press” means they get to report only what supports their agenda.

Here are the definitions of Democracy and Republic which Europe does not fit either. If CNN was honest, they would actually have to agree with the criticism of both Russia and China for the West is a Republic, and would never allow a democracy for then the people would vote on all of these spending issues instead of our pretend representatives since we are a Republic – not a Democracy.

So sorry, Biden’s Summit of Democracy is indeed a joke. Nowhere in the West do the people live in a democracy. It is all a republic and Europe does not even qualify as a republic it is closer to China and Russia than the United States. Historically, republics always die by their own hand – economic suicide which is unfolding perfectly once again. At some point, there will be a new version of Caesar who will cross the Rubicon.

Washington gathered an army of 13,000 militia set out to wage war against the American people,

 Federalist v Ant-Federalist / Vaccinated v Anti-Vaccinated

Posted Nov 29, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

more

QUESTION: Hi Mr. Armstrong,

Thanks for all you do and all your hard work!

I have a question I was hoping you would comment on. I have been trying to wrap my head around the hows (not the whys) of the absurd consequences of this plandemic.  What it reminds me of is the fight between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists during the ratification process of the Constitution. I was taught the Bill of Rights bridged the gap between the issues back then and obviously satisfied their differences since the ratification went through.

Today, it seems as if there is no Bill of Rights and no possible bridge to balance political differences. There are tyrannical federal policies (under the guise of public health/national security) and the lawsuits from state AGs, governors and private organizations to prevent these policies.  This is the obvious recourse.  But it seems this is not enough and more importantly this recourse will not prevent the same thing from happening again in the future.

So my question is what recourse did the Anti-Federalists have (after the Bill of Rights were added to the Constitution) to address their worst fears? Elections? Overthrowing the government?

Are the Bill of Rights being violated just during this cycle of history?  Or is there really no other recourse besides arming ourselves if the police decide not to support the people?

JC

ANSWER: The recourse of the anti-Federalists was separation which led to the American Civil War. What you are saying is only partly true. They voted on the Constitution without the Bill of Rights. They got it through only on a majority vote of 39 out of 70 attendants. To the surprise of most, the United States was wrongfully created and the Federalists won at first, but it was the opposite party of Jefferson that eventually took down the Federalist Party.

It was Alexander Hamilton who led the charge to ratify the Constitution. He solicited John Jay and James Madison, and together they would create a series of 85 articles, published in the New York newspapers between October 27, 1787, and August 16, 1788, which became known as the Federalist Papers. It was Hamilton who chose the title of The Federalist, which was at that moment a controversial act of political aggression since it was the anti-Constitutionalists were actually for federalism insofar as it was a union. By entitling this article series The Federalist, Hamilton would take the high ground by asserting that the Constitution represented a better version of federalism than the Articles of Confederation.

Once federalism took hold, it quickly became self-evident that the people overthrew a king for ruthless bureaucrats. The Whiskey Rebellion was a tax protest in the United States beginning in 1791, during the presidency of George Washington. Farmers who used their leftover grain and corn in the form of whiskey as a medium of exchange were forced to pay a new tax. Yes – it was a 1791 version of Bitcoin. Many participants were Revolutionary War veterans, who argued that they were fighting for the very same principles of the American Revolution – no taxation without local representation. Of course, the new Federal government maintained the taxes were the legal authority of the taxing powers of Congress that they put in the Constitution – not the people.

It was in July 1794 this first confrontation between those who really had not consented to this federalism erupted into violence with more than 500 armed men attacking the fortified home of tax inspector General John Neville. President Washington responded personally with men he then called “rebels” to justify their massacre. Once the state attaches the label “criminal” it then justifies violence against them regardless of the issue in question.

Washington gathered an army of 13,000 militia provided by the governors of Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, and set out to wage war against the American people, most of whom had fought for American Independence. Washington rode at the head of an army personally. The rebels were way outnumbered and it became clear, pay your taxes or you will be dead. The rebels went home before the arrival of the army, and there was no confrontation. Nonetheless, it was at that moment that the evil of the federalist was exposed once and for all.

The union from that moment on was NEVER 100%. As I said, the ratification was 39 out of 70 votes and if human nature is what it is, there were probably votes that were bought with gold. It was this union by force that led to the American Revolution. The slavery issue was simply that it was the labor force in those days. Today they are outlawing fossil fuels which is already altering the course of the economy. Putting the human question of slavery aside and looking at this from an economic perspective, the North was telling the South they had to lockdown their economy and effectively terminate its existence. Naturally, with time, many stayed and were paid wages instead of just free room and board as was the case of serfdom. A serf could not be sold except with the farm whereas a slave could be sold individually.

In modern terms, if you are an outlaw the means to earn a living over whatever issue, they will rise up against the source of that decree. Hence, history will repeat because human nature remains the same. Consequently, the ONLY solution will be separation for the tyranny of the majority will also result in civil war.

The career politicians - it’s us they hate the most. Agenda - retain power and move toward authoritarian rule eliminating democracy once and for all.

 

Schwab & How One Man Can Be So Powerful

osted Sep 3, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Hello, all the world’s leading figures are part of the WEF. But how is
it possible that one man was able to brainwash everyone? It seems
incredible!!!

MG

ANSWER: When Nigel Farage spoke at our 2019 Rome World Economic Conference, he said he came because we were the “alternative to Davos.” For years I have been on the opposite side of the table from Schwab. Why have the politicians embraced him instead of me? Very simple. My solution to the debt crisis necessitates that they give up some power. Schwab’s solution was to seize more control.

The politicians have reached the end of the road where they have constantly been kicking the can. The game is up. They have been borrowing year after year with no intention of ever paying off debt. They lowered rates artificially, and that not only failed to stimulate the economy since the 2014 move to negative rates, but they have committed political and economic suicide. So they have created this COVID scam to crush the economy in support of Schwab’s idea of stakeholder economics, which will be a hybrid of communism and feudalism where the elite will own everything just like the aristocrats. We, the peasants, will be stripped of our right even to vote because we are obviously too stupid to see the vision of the future. Creating this one-world government will end all wars and save the planet.

 

Video Player

00:00

01:18

 

So the politicians have bought into this agenda BECAUSE they will retain power and move toward authoritarian rule eliminating democracy once and for all. It was the election of Trump that made them wake up and suddenly see that the people rallied to a non-politician. They saw “POPULISM” as dangerous to their self-interest, and since 2016, they have moved to agree with Schwab to end this horrible ability of the public to get rid of them – the career politicians. It’s us they hate the most — the Great Unwashed who are too stupid to know what is best for them – only a politician has such a right!

It is not that Schwab has the power to order them to comply, they have embraced Schwab to retain power at all costs. To them, they are stripping us of all humanity little by little. The means justify the ends.

Spain Revealing the Totalitarian Future for All

 

Posted Jul 6, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Spain is just putting it all out there. There is new legislation that effectively allows the total end of democracy and All freedom in Spain and this is just the beginning. Any person of legal age will be obliged to carry out the “personal benefits” required by the government, following the guidelines of the National Security Council, whenever the government declares a state of crisis for any reason whatsoever including health. Spain is declaring that all citizens are really slaves of the state without human rights. There is to be no exception and everyone MUST comply with the orders and instructions issued by the government. This new National Security Law stated:

In the event that a state of crisis is declared in Spain (‘situation of interest to National Security’ is the name given by law), the authorities may also proceed to the temporary requisition of all types of property, at the intervention or provisional occupation of those that are necessary or the suspension of all kinds of activities.

In the event that a state of crisis is declared in Spain (“situation of interest to National Security” is the name given by law), the authorities may also proceed to the temporary seizure of all types of property, at the intervention or provisional occupation of those that are necessary or the suspension of all kinds of activities. That is so vague it will allow the government to seize all your bank accounts and even your home – PERIOD! Those who suffer financial damages due to the seizure of their property or the interruption of their activity will have the right to be compensated. In its first drafts, the law excludes the payment of compensation to those who are obliged to make a personal benefit.  Therefore, any crisis they declare which can be health, environmental, economic, or financial nature, will be covered as well as an invasion from Mars.

However, this new duty to surrender all property does not stop with individuals. This ALSO applies to companies and legal entities to collaborate with the authorities to overcome whatever crisis they in their sole discretion determine. This introduces yet another new risk to owning any Spanish stocks. The politicians have cleverly found justification for eliminating human rights is contained in article 30 of the Constitution, according to which “Spaniards have the duty and right to defend Spain.”

On top of that, the government can also create mandatory military service which had been suspended in Spain back in 2001. They are referring to the 4th section, according to which, “by law, the duties of citizens may be regulated in cases of serious risk, catastrophe or public calamity .” This constitutional provision has remained until now inactive. The drafting of this legislation was deliberate toexclude it from any “organic law” which is the only one that can affect fundamental rights. The crisis is to be declared by the head of state – not the courts.

The obligation of the media

The new legislation also addresses the media. This draft includes the obligation of the media to collaborate with the competent authorities in the dissemination of information of a preventive or operational nature. In other words, it terminates the freedom of the press. The press will be compelled to put out only the government view.

This is what is coming down for all of Europe.